It is our job to find truth and extract justice for our clients by distilling the vapor of nuance from these latent facts. These facts are never reviewed by an appellate court unless they are collected, preserved, interpreted, presented, and introduced as evidence. Like latent fingerprints, we often see only remnants and traces of facts. Facts do not announce themselves, and rarely does the judge or jury understand the significance of any fact. And mostly importantly you, the lawyer, must find facts. Whether you practice Admiralty Law or Wills and Estates, you must wrestle with disputed facts. You’re going to have to deal with the good facts, the bad facts, and the ambiguous facts. Because no matter what type of law you practice, you’re going to have to deal with the facts of your case. The way the facts are recited often allows the reader to begin developing a just result in the case simply by the way the facts are presented.īut what does the first year of law school teach you about developing facts? We certainly spend a great deal of time analyzing facts, but how do you produce them? How do facts become evidence? Why do some facts seem to matter more than other facts? At a time in our society when it is hard to find common ground on what constitutes an objective fact, how do current attitudes (and social media) affect our profession where so much of the law depends upon the facts?Īnd nestled somewhere between Evidence and Federal Courts perhaps our Course Catalog will one day have a class devoted entirely to Facts. The facts are critical in developing the legal opinions pronounced by the opinion. Every appellate court opinion begins with a narrative of the facts. ![]() Importantly, while trial court judges can publish written opinions on discreet issues, most of your previous reading focused on appellate court opinions. The emphasis of much of your reading was on the results of published cases and the legal principles each case teaches. You spent the first year of law school analyzing published cases. Throughout the course we will also examine the role of leadership in policy making. actions on both international and domestic policy. Students will learn to understand the implications of U.S. In the scenarios, students will be confronted with the challenges of whether to conduct a drone strike in a denied area, address the development of nuclear weapons in Iran, a potential conflict between Russia and NATO, whether to intervene in a potential Global contagion and several other current international problems. The course goes beyond the theoretical and analytical to understanding exactly how national security policy is made in the most complex and politically sensitive environments. Students will be exposed to a variety of geopolitical scenarios and working in conjunction with a “national security team” they will develop a list of options for government leaders. The purpose of the course is to expose students to contemporary policy challenges in the national security arena and, in doing so, provide the student a framework for making future decisions across the entire public policy spectrum.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |